Siphonic vs. Conventional Drainage

In large-scale projects, factories, shopping malls, and airports, rainwater drainage is one of the most critical engineering items for the safety and longevity of the structure. Knowing the differences between traditional conventional drainage systems and modern engineering-driven siphonic drainage systems will help you make the right choice for your project.

What is a Conventional Drainage System?

A conventional system is a traditional method based on the principle of water flowing through pipes with the help of gravity. In this system, air and water move through the pipes in a mixed state.

Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Advantage: Installation is quite simple and the error margin during application is low. Since it is a traditional system, maintenance costs are initially economical.
  • Disadvantage: Pipes must be laid with a horizontal slope, which causes significant elevation differences and extra excavation work in large spans.
  • Filling Capacity: Physically, the system operates at 70% capacity in horizontal lines and only 33% in vertical lines; this means larger pipe diameters are required.
  • Downpipe Quantity: A separate downpipe may be required for each outlet, creating a high number of pipe lines and complexity within the building.

What is a Siphonic Drainage System?

The siphonic system operates on the principle of water filling the pipes 100%, creating a vacuum (suction) effect thanks to specially designed outlets and a closed pipe system.

Why Should You Choose a Siphonic System?
  • 100% Efficiency: Thanks to the siphonic effect, the pipes operate at full capacity, allowing the same amount of water to be discharged through much smaller pipe diameters.
  • Architectural Freedom: Pipes can be laid with zero slope horizontally. This is a major advantage for projects requiring aesthetics and space-saving, such as malls, airports, and convention centers.
  • Low Infrastructure Cost: Significant savings are achieved in total infrastructure and excavation costs since fewer downpipes and smaller diameter pipes are used.
  • Quieter and Safer: The system operates more quietly than conventional systems and immediately reveals any leaks, reducing repair costs.

Technical Comparison Table

Feature Conventional Drainage Siphonic Drainage
Pipe Slope Horizontal slope required Zero horizontal slope
Filling Rate 33% - 70% (Air+Water) 100% (Full Flow)
Pipe Diameters Large diameters are used Smaller diameters are sufficient
Downpipe Quantity High number of downpipes Very few downpipes
Calculation Method Traditional methods Certified software and meteorological data

Conclusion: Which System is More Suitable?

If you have a small-scale residential project, the conventional system can be preferred for its simplicity. However, for industrial structures with large roof areas, the siphonic drainage system is undoubtedly the most economical and efficient solution due to its architectural convenience and minimized infrastructure costs.

To achieve successful results in siphonic systems, it is critical that the design is carried out by expert engineers, meteorological data is analyzed precisely, and installation is performed by trained teams.

Explore Our Products:
Zet Mekanik Product Catalog